<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Module Pattern vs. Custom Objects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.klauskomenda.com/archives/2008/10/01/module-pattern-vs-custom-objects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.klauskomenda.com/archives/2008/10/01/module-pattern-vs-custom-objects/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:41:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klaus</title>
		<link>http://www.klauskomenda.com/archives/2008/10/01/module-pattern-vs-custom-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-13572</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klauskomenda.com/?p=505#comment-13572</guid>
		<description>@Ionut:
Well, yes, if you have a look at it, the original module pattern creates a single instance of an object that encapsulates all your functionality - a singleton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ionut:<br />
Well, yes, if you have a look at it, the original module pattern creates a single instance of an object that encapsulates all your functionality &#8211; a singleton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ionut</title>
		<link>http://www.klauskomenda.com/archives/2008/10/01/module-pattern-vs-custom-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-13562</link>
		<dc:creator>Ionut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klauskomenda.com/?p=505#comment-13562</guid>
		<description>So basically the module pattern is fit for singletons right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So basically the module pattern is fit for singletons right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klaus</title>
		<link>http://www.klauskomenda.com/archives/2008/10/01/module-pattern-vs-custom-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-11603</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 18:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klauskomenda.com/?p=505#comment-11603</guid>
		<description>@Yoan:
You are right, it was more an experiment to test whether the Module Pattern can be abused to do something else. No real practical reason, I suppose :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yoan:<br />
You are right, it was more an experiment to test whether the Module Pattern can be abused to do something else. No real practical reason, I suppose <img src='http://www.klauskomenda.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoan</title>
		<link>http://www.klauskomenda.com/archives/2008/10/01/module-pattern-vs-custom-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-11443</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.klauskomenda.com/?p=505#comment-11443</guid>
		<description>Why using the module pattern when you&#039;re not doing singletons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why using the module pattern when you&#8217;re not doing singletons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

